For the past few days my psychotic mind was dwelling on the question why it is always necessary for transient variable to be in my life. Why am I not complete without any transient variables? What is completeness? I did some mental masturbation on this for four painful days and the answer seems to come out quite interesting. Of course there is a hell a lot of difference in realizing the answer and living in the real world. It’s difficult to be adhesive and still be cohesive but let me see where I go with this. So here it goes. I never read any books until I got my answer but I came back to my desk to read some contextual articles to extend my cognitive conclusions...
You must find your own answers.. like I have done with my own rules herein.
This is also an example to say when you are deeply dwelled in the world of analytics or physics or mathematics beyond the realm of their material explanations it leads to a wonderful spiritual experience. So yes analytics is one of the drivers for my spirituality now ..
So here it goes…..
If you remove a part from infinity or add a part to infinity, still what remains is infinity
-The Isha Upanishad or Yajurveda
My Equation for completeness---
So say X + Y = 5
2 + 3 = 5
5 is incomplete by 5 for 10 and 10 is incomplete by another 10 for 20. Therefore no equation can substantiate the ‘complete’. A variable can only be merged with the complete.
For him who owns and or is infinity, Transfinite and complete, giving something doesn’t make him incomplete or less than infinity or little less than transfinite. He is still complete and transfinite.They say whole is something else than the individual sum of parts. because summing up is a meaningless procedure, whereas the whole-part relationship is meaningful. Summing takes its meaning because we have zero as a referrence point. Imagine that as an arbitrary point in the space and you can start your own scale of measurments. Its like none of us is smart than all of us put together, so think what all of universes put together could become. Therefore taking out a quantity from the whole - the whole hasnt decreased. Your ability to measure, comprehend, hold etc has reduced. Thats all. Absolute - Anything is always > anything always. --Vasanth
For him who has 1 and needs another one and another one and another 100 AND MORE. No 100's will satisfy him because it is not really the 100's that he wants. What he wants is that which is does not have. And that what he has is always incomplete.
For him therefore Absoluted + anything is still < absolute always
So there you go, these are my answers. therfore i already know that all the variables are taransient,incomplete with referrece to absolute by nature and fleeting because it is with respect to a start point and by such referrence always needs to have another referrence point. there is nothing called as temperary or permanent the only "thing" that is permanent, complete, truth is the space. I call him as Krishna. so the only path to complete bliss, happiness where these is nothing called as "sorrow" or "pain" or "happiness" ( materialitically) there exists no illusion but just the truth is in the fact of merging yourself with the complete. Being completely aware of your inner self, being constantly seraching yourself and paving your way to merge in the complete is the true path!!!! yes it sounds very philosophical but when you are faced with this question in your life do remember these words!!!.
Just when you thought that this job was not giving that kick and money that you wanted, say you changed your job and went on changing your job untill the ground broke and the questions errupted like a volacnoe in your mind that which job wuld give me the ultimate happiness that i want? the question you must ask is what is happiness!!!!!!! what is truth? what is making me so restless? how many billion dollars do i need to be happy? how may girfirends do i need to be happy? and so on and you will find that a million questions and conginitve conlficts will surface.
its good to live in a state of conginitve confusion untill you find your own answers !!
In addition to these, I read some really good articles by a mathematician and I’m calling out the abstract for your extended reading, though complicated but very interesting.
Here is one intresting article i read
Franklin Merrell-Wolff's theory on what is infinity, Space, point and zero?
Just as in mathematics there are infinitudes of higher orders infinitely transcending lower infinities, so it is in the Transcendent World . . .I have found an Infinite World, and then another Infinite consuming the first. . .It is an Infinity of some higher order, that is an INFINITY which comprehends lesser Infinities .
Upon zero we build our systems of reference,
Which is merely a way of saying that with nothing as a center we have the fulcrum for control of all elaborations in form . . . The pure 'I' is the zero-point of organized consciousness. This first ego-lessness, this bare point-I, is then transformed into the Space-I. "The Transcendent 'I' is as much a space as a point. (I’d like to call out here the correlation between disparate philosophies. Science says to attain speed of light the particle must have no mass. Spirituality says to attain enlightenment one must have no ego, no desire etc etc etc )
Its mathematical symbol would be both (zero) and (infinity). Yet in the High Indifference, this self blows out leaving only Consciousness- Without-An-Object (and Without-A-Subject). "Consciousness-Without-An- Object is the universal solvent within which the centers of tension, or objects, have their field of play. All tendencies in that play is counter-balanced by its counter-tendency, the culminating effect being an expression equated to zero.
It is zero that symbolizes the durable Reality, or Consciousness-Without-An-Object. This is the higher sense of zero or emptiness, symbolizing the cancellation of the positive and negative polarizations corresponding to the Universe and Nirvana Wolff coined the term 'inverse cognitions' to describe cognitions polarized in the opposite sense as objective cognitions, i.e. toward the Nirvanic.
"Awareness of the absence of objects, in its purity, is not cognition of an object, but another form of consciousness that is not concerned with objects. However, a reflection of this state of consciousness may be produced so that a special cognition arises, of such a nature that its content is definable as the inverse of all objects. .
I hope these raise a lot of cognitive questions in your mind, may you be drawn towards the truth and complete – Vasanth.
